skip to main |
skip to sidebar
Abraham Lincoln is known as one of the greatest presidents the United States has seen. His rise from the backwater prairies of Illinois as a circuit lawyer to the highest position in the country seemed almost impossible if not improbable. Historians and writers have explored the reasons behind Lincoln’s success for years, covered every angle, but Doris Kearns Goodwin’s newest book “Team of Rivals: The Political Genius of Abraham Lincoln” takes a different look at the nation’s most powerful men.
There’s an old saying that advises one to keep friends close, but enemies closer; Lincoln is the embodiment of that saying. After taking the presidency, Lincoln needed a strong and dependable cabinet. Having come from the periphery, Lincoln was unknown, untried and had little political support. Instead of choosing people who supported him throughout his campaign, Lincoln went with four men who all held a grudge against him, who all desired his newly acquired position. Edwin M. Stanton, Secretary of War, despised Lincoln when they first met in the courtroom in 1855 and treated him with contempt. Salmon P. Chase, Secretary of the Treasury, thought he to be Lincoln’s superior, resenting him for taking the position he thought rightly his. William H. Seward, Secretary of State, was positive of his nomination for president when Lincoln stole the stage and saw his position in Lincoln’s cabinet his chance to make the president a figure head, leaving him in charge. Edward Bates, Attorney General, came out of retirement for the candidacy, but when he lost, he vowed to decline any cabinet position offered. All four men had plans to bring the new president down, and all four grew to admire and respect the tall, lanky man whose ambition was to change the country.
Goodwin explores the complexities of Lincoln’s cabinet and his presidency, making “Team of Rivals” stand out from the other Lincoln literature with her in depth analysis of the complex interpersonal relationships and personal motivations of each man. Instead of focusing on purely political or bureaucratic stories, which are dry and cause eyelids to droop, this piece of nonfiction takes the opposite road, studying the mortal men who shaped the country. Chase was undeniably an ambitious man who sought to receive recognition with a passion unrivaled and would use anyone to his own advantage. In him are the old puritan ways that helped found the country and the makings of a dangerous man. Seward, undoubtedly also an ambitious man, craved the presidency and sought to undermine Lincoln at every step.
Goodwin’s ability as a writer to take such a political endeavor and turn the book into a narrative is unparalleled. Her passion for the topic shines throughout the pages; she turns a dry topic into one of almost epic proportions, keeping the reader anxious, wondering what’s next. Rather than seeming as cold, dry cut men from history books who have accomplished this deed and that, Lincoln and his cabinet are shown as real people who suffered, had their hopes dashed, found joy and lived. There are times where even a great narration can get tough to read through, but stick with it, the whole story is ultimately rewarding.
Downside to the book is the length. Trying to find a nice, quick read of maybe 200-300 pages? Don’t read this book. If a 1,000 page book is not daunting, then go the nearest library and check out “Team of Rivals” immediately.
The Chinese zodiac, for most, is just a cute little wheel of 12 animals printed on paper placemats in a Chinese restaurant. While waiting for their food to be delivered, some people glance at the circle, quickly finding their animal representation with barely a second thought.
Jane Lindskold, an up-and-coming fantasy novelist, has taken the zodiac to a new level in her most recent novel, “Thirteen Orphans.” Exploring the Chinese myth behind the 12 animals and incorporating the gambling game Mahjong, Lindskold attempts to give her readers a different kind of story. Was she successful in her endeavor? Definitely not.
“Thirteen Orphans” follows young collegiate Brenda Morris as she is inducted into the strange world of the Thirteen Orphans, people with magical abilities who are associated with the twelve animals and their dethroned Emperor. Along with her father (the Rat), a close family friend (the Tiger) and three other “orphans” (the Dog, the Rabbit and the Rooster), they embark on a perilous journey (of course) to find out who is stealing the memories of the other “orphans.” It’s pretty easy to follow and extremely easy to get bored with.
“Thirteen Orphans” is the first novel in Lindskold’s new series “Breaking the Wall” and, like most first novels in series, it has a lot of setting up to do. The trickiest part is to balance between setting up and keeping the plot moving, something that Lindskold failed miserably at. The book’s 368 pages are full of dialogue geared towards explaining concepts and history of the “orphans” to the reader, as well as covering repeatedly the same plan to save the afflicted “orphans.”
The only real development in story came at the very end, but still not gratifying enough to rationalize reading the previous 300 pages. Had the dialogue not been so contrived, it might have given the story more oomph.
Another factor to consider is the actual characters. The main protagonist, Brenda, who is supposed to be a college freshman, is way too easygoing. She has no clue about the “orphans” and when she suddenly receives a crash course in her ancestral heritage, she’s pretty mellow about it.
Hold the phone. An 18-year-old girl has just been told that she is an heiress to a powerful magician (and not the hocus pocus kind), that the game of Mahjong is actually a powerful magical tool and that her ancestors are not from the earthly world and all she does is shrug her shoulders? In no way is that realistic.
Herein lies another fatal flaw with Lindskold’s work: her characters are entirely fictional; they have no realistic qualities or mannerisms. Though the characters were duds (none were likeable enough), Lindskold’s writing was a little above average. Her true writing talent shines through in her other works, most notably in the “Firekeeper” saga.
“Thirteen Orphans” was easy to lose interest in, the characters were unrealistic and the writing was OK. Maybe the best things about the book are the details of playing Mahjong and the extensive research Lindskold did in Chinese mythology and history. If you’re still interested after all of that, give the novel a go; maybe the second book will be better. Otherwise, this is definitely not a book one would recommend.
1 out of 5
“We’re off to see the Wizard, the Wonderful Wizard of Oz!”
Those memorable words from the classic 1939 movie “The Wizard of Oz” have sparked “wiz mania” in today’s culture-rich world. From the latest TV adaptation, “Tin Man,” to the acclaimed Broadway musical “Wicked,” the classic Oz story never goes out of style.
In the literary world, award-winning author Gregory Maguire gives the Land of Oz new life in his latest novel, “A Lion Among Men,” telling the tale from the viewpoint of the “overlooked” characters originally created by L. Frank Baum.
Before reading “A Lion Among Men,” check out Maguire’s other two Oz novels.
The first novel, “Wicked,” paints a different picture of the land Dorothy visited in the movie. The Wonderful Wizard of Oz, acclaimed ruler and altogether great guy, turned out not to be so wonderful after all. The Wizard of Oz (WOO) was a tyrant who oppressed the people of Oz.
Maguire instead gave the world the real hero (or heroine) in the Land of Oz: public enemy number one, the Wicked Witch of the West. Elphaba Thropp, the supposed Wicked Witch, was born green, cursed to a destiny as an outcast. She was an “evil witch” fighting against the WOO, trying to free the land from an oppressor, and spent her life doing what she thought right.
In death, she left behind her young son Liir, whose story is told in Maguire’s second novel, “Son of a Witch.”
In “A Lion Among Men,” the latest tale of Oz follows the Cowardly Lion, Brrr, on a mission to record the truth behind Elphaba’s infamous past and find the Grimmerie, her mysterious magic book — all to keep his own hide out of jail. War looms on the horizon between Oz and the seceded Munchkinland, and the enigmatic Clock of the Time Dragon roams again around the countryside.
A newly self-appointed emperor sits on the throne and is a new-fangled tyrant in the making. In a world where magic exists and the politics of the Emerald City choke the land, it’s up to the cowardly, wicked and morally corrupt to break free of their own infamy and save Oz.
The narrative provides a view of viable, dynamic characters. They feel pain; they suffer, and they have hopes and fears. The main characters in Maguire’s novel are Brrr, the Cowardly Lion, an old prophetess, Yackle, a young girl saved from captivity by the keepers of the Clock of the Time Dragon and a strange, fragile cat that seems made of glass.
The story is told mostly from Brrr’s point of view, and it is interesting to note how cynical the Cowardly Lion is. The reader automatically sympathizes with Brrr in the beginning as he recounts his first encounter with man: a conversation he had with a young man whose leg was caught in a trap. Brrr, a young cub at this point, does not understand the man’s suffering and it’s painful as a reader to watch the interaction between the two.
After a while, Brrr’s tendencies, mannerisms and selfishness become aggravating and the question has to be asked: will Brrr ever be able to overcome his own cowardice to become a decent (and likeable) character?
Though the characterizations are fabulous, the storyline can be slow and tiresome. Some of the actions are easily passed over; dull to readers, the importance of some passages become inconsequential. The writing itself is average, on par with majority of other fantasy writers.
In Maguire’s case, it is the storytelling that makes the novel so great, not the writing. When he debuted “Wicked” in 1995, it was a phenomenal hit. The story was new, exciting, intriguing and captivating. Sadly, as is the case with most sequels and series, “A Lion Among Men” pales in comparison. The bravado found first in “Wicked” has since diminished, and it is as if Maguire is continuing on his version of Oz to appease readers’ insatiable desires to know what happens after the melting of the Wicked Witch.
Avid fan of the “Wicked” series? Go buy a copy today. Merely curious as to how Maguire personifies the Cowardly Lion? Go to the nearest library and rent a copy. Enjoy the novel and be prepared for dry spots. Stick with it though; it’s rewarding in the end.
4 out of 5 stars
In a nation where politics rule and extremists run rampant through our neighborhood streets, one man dares to stand up against the insanity to voice his opinions loud and in all profanity. Get ready for the outrageous ranting about feminists to the raving doctrines of religious zealots in Marty Beckerman’s newest slanderous novel “Dumbocracy: Adventures with the Loony Left, the Rabid Right and Other American Idiots.”
Spending four years on the frontlines of the hottest American debates interviewing the grunt workers from both the political left and right, Beckerman has created a hilarious and scathing commentary bashing the “True Believer mentality.” The book explores American and foreign policies when it comes to abortion, gay rights, sex, drugs and all those other things considered poisons on society. Packed with interviews from both sides, Beckerman exposes the hypocrisies lying at the heart of their arguments and gives his candid opinions, no matter how offensive, saucy or chock-full of vulgarities.
The first sentence in the introduction sums up what a reader should expect from this book: “Opinions are like genitals: if you force others to swallow yours, something is seriously wrong with you.” The insults, criticisms, “snarky” footnote comments and all around bashing are refreshing.
Making fun of extremists and the government is nothing new — “The Daily Show” and “The Colbert Report” do this five days a week. Even cartoons such as “South Park” are constantly ripping on anti-sex/violence/drugs/fun movements.
It’s refreshing to get the same quality entertainment from a book. Each chapter highlights specific arguments between the left and right from abortion, to foreign policy, to the insanity of a puritanical government that cares nothing for free will and the right to pursue happiness (however each person defines the phrase).
The titles for each section are hilarious enough by themselves. Beckerman’s satirical ravings bring tears to the eyes and pain to the diaphragm from all the subsequent laughter.
The most difficult thing to accomplish with such a book is to actually get people to read and take the opinions written down on the page into consideration. Beckerman does this easily with his style of writing: openly critique with clever one-liners and let the crazies dig their own holes with their words, and throw in a few well placed profanities for some flavor. Magnifique!
He also throws stats around left and right (no pun intended), using nifty little factoids to spice things up and laugh in the faces of those he criticizes.
This is a must read for anyone, whether a feminist or god-fearing zealot, pornographic supporter or anti-fun campaigner. Go out today, purchase a copy, laugh a lot and enjoy a wonderful novel bashing the insanity of today’s society.
5 out of 5 stars.
Romance, intrigue, and politics can all be found in Philippa Gregory’s newest historical fiction novel, “The Other Queen.”
Moving away from the Tudor royal court, Gregory takes her readers into the countryside of England to the home of George Talbot, Earl of Shrewsbury. It is here that Mary Stuart, also known as Mary, Queen of Scots, resides as a “guest” after she seeks sanctuary from her own country. In reality, she is a prisoner, treated with comfort and care until her execution day. But she finds no love or sympathy in the Earl’s wife, Bess of Hardwick, who is a staunch royalist. Determined to see Mary hung, Bess will stop at nothing to bring her down and gain back the love of her husband.
Also wrapped up in the political intrigue are William Cecil, the right hand man of Queen Elizabeth, and Thomas Howard, cousin to the Queen and the Duke of Norfolk, as well as many more prominent figures in 16th century England.
As always, Gregory does a beautiful job of painting a picture of England while under the rule of the Tudors. Unlike her other novels of this era, Gregory switches gears, focusing on a Queen whose reputation as “a vain woman, a sinful woman, an idolatrous Papist woman” clouds the truth of who she really was. Gregory attempts to open her readers’ minds by showing the true character of Mary, giving her audience her vision of a strong woman faced with difficulty choices trying to keep her head.
This is what Gregory does best in her writing; she chooses women, strong women in their own right, and extrapolates from her research their characters, their personalities. Talbot’s wife, Bess, is a woman who had at least three marriages before landing an Earl and all three times she married to her advantage. Her business-like nature, conniving and cunning are the attributes that kept her alive and well, but it’s easy to forget her vulnerability and the vulnerability of Mary as well.
Though Gregory is a great writer, her stories are pretty much predictable. The trickiest thing about being a historical fiction author is that they cannot change history. Certain events must occur, some characters are doomed to disaster and the “good guy” does not always triumph.
The reader knows how the story will end, but the joy of reading a historical novel is not to reach the culmination of events. One reads this genre to understand more about the people in history, to see how their minds worked and their personalities through the eyes of the author.
So even if Gregory’s stories can be predicted and her writing style never changes, she can still weave together a beautiful piece of fiction to be enjoyed by almost anyone, men and women alike.
4 out of 5 stars
